Which statement best describes the escort requirements for minimum custody?

The statement that describes the escort requirements for minimum custody correctly indicates that no restraints are necessary when there is one guard per ten prisoners. This reflects a level of trust and oversight typical in minimum custody situations, where the detainees are considered lower risk and can be allowed more freedom of movement under the supervision of a guard.

In these environments, the focus is often on managing prisoners who pose minimal threat to themselves or others, thus justifying the absence of restraints. The presence of a single guard for multiple prisoners is contingent on the understanding that the risks associated with these prisoners are low enough that additional restraint measures are not needed. This approach enhances the detainees' feeling of dignity and trust within an environment intended to prepare them for reintegration into society.

Restraint requirements in other scenarios, such as during transportation or for higher custody levels, typically involve stricter measures to ensure the safety and security of guards and the public, which is why those options do not apply to minimum custody situations.